Wednesday, March 28, 2007

The Secret Life of Lobsters

: How Fishermen and Scientists Are Unraveling the Mysteries of Our Favorite Crustacean
by Trevor Corson, copyright 2004

Prologue: Setting Out, 2001
Lobsters are fewer than in previous years. Bruce Fernald's boat in 2001 is the Double Trouble, and Jacob Pickering is his sternman. Jack Merrill has the Bottom Dollar. Bob steneck, a scientist, is on the R/V Connecticut, with the ROV Phantom.

Part One: Trapping
1. A Haul of Heritage
In 1973, after 4 years in the Navy, Bruce goes out with his father Warren in the Mother Ann. Bruce's great-great-great-grandfather Henry Fernald settled on Great Cranberry when lobster traps were "newfangled technology." Jack's family lived in suburban Massachusetts, and he spent his summers on Little Cranberry Island because his father's ancestors had come from Maine. Jack learned lobstering from Warren Fernald.
2. Honey Holes
Bruce's boat was Pa's Pride, which he bought from his brother Mark, who had bought it from Warren. Their brother Dan bought a fiberglass boat in 1974. Lee Hamm "has a knack for planting his traps in the depressions in the seafloor, where lobsters liked to hide and hunt. He called these spots his honey holes" (p. 33).

Part Two: Mating
3. Scent of a Woman
Jelle Atema, who came to America from the Netherlands, studied lobsters at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod, starting in 1970. He first hypothesized that a sex pheromone from female lobsters attracted the males.
4. The Man Show
Jelle Atema had huge new lobster tanks and was surprised to find the females going to the dominant male in the tank, who "simply waited at home" (p. 62). When the first female left, another female came calling at the home of the dominant male. Meanwhile, the human males of Little Cranberry Island were also looking for mates.
5. Sex, Size, and Videotape
Diane Cowan began watching lobsters in the tank. She discovered the non-dominant male (of two in a tank with five females) did NOT get to mate because females waited their turn with the dominant male. Later, Diane snipped antennules, so the lobsters couldn't smell, and one experiment got ugly. "Cutting the antennules off males had left them pugnacious and inept, but the females had still managed to cajole the noseless males into a standard courtship routine. Cutting the antennules off females, by contrast, had nullified the routine and caused chaos" (p. 81). The females' ability to smell was key to successful mating.

Part Three: Fighting
6. Eviction Notice
When Bob Steneck, marine ecologist at the University of Maine, tried to sneak up to observe lobsters, they were alerted by pressure waves emitted by the bubbles in his scuba regulator and turned to face him with claws raised (p. 88). So he set up lobster "neighborhoods" of PVC-pipe homes and watched them from a boat using a miniature ROV that didn't bother the lobsters (p. 91). I loved the lobster eviction process, with the larger lobster knocking on a claw (like on a door), the smaller one coming out and stepping aside, and the big guy moving in (p. 97). I wanted to see a big lobster "at home" in his cubbyhole. Enlarge the photo by clicking on it, and you'll see this one up close and personal.
7. Battle Lines
One of the lobstermen told Bob that if he wanted to do research in their territory, all he had to do was ask. Because he was keen to observe ever better neighborhoods, it wasn't long before Bob had talked Arnie and his colleagues into removing their traps from a section of their best fishing ground so he could census the local population of lobsters. It was a feat unequaled in the history of lobster science, and it signaled a new era of collaborative research. (p. 112)
8. The War of the Eggs
The government argued that the minimum size of lobsters needed to be raised to increase egg production (p. 122). Jack Merrill used the same report to argue that: "The V-notching program holds substantial promise as a means of protecting the brood stock. If we assume for the sake of comparison that one out of every four un-notched egged females that is caught gets V-notched every year, then total egg production will be more than doubled for only a slight decline in catch" (p. 123).
9. Claw Lock
Lobsters have an interesting fight method, with one giving up before his shell shatters. The real battle reported in this chapter, though, is between Maine's lobstermen and the government scientists. The government calls into question the scientific expertise of Bob Steneck, who is on the side of the lobstermen. Bob had shown the large lobsters easily fight off the small ones, but when presented with a whole crowd on contenders, the big ones would rather walk away than fight constantly. But the government ruled that "Dr. Steneck's work ... does not provide sufficient scientific evidence to advise terminating the gauge increases" (p. 135).

Part Four: Surviving
10. The Superlobsters
11. Attack of the Killer Fish
12. Kindergarten Cops

Part Five: Sensing
13. See No Evil
14. Against the Wind

Part Six: Brooding
15. Gathering the Flock
16. Victory Dance
17. Fickle Seas

Epilogue: Hauling In, 2001

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Gore testifies before Senate committee


I tuned in to the webcast of all two-and-a-half hours of Al Gore's appearance before the Senate's Environment and Public Works committee today.

"Now, with a starring role in an Oscar-winning documentary under his belt, a best-selling book and a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, the former vice-president and longtime legislator was greeted like a conquering hero when he wasn't being challenged by global warming skeptics.

"Gore, who held the first hearings in Congress on the issue 20 years ago, urged legislators to respond to a 'true planetary emergency' by passing legislation cutting greenhouse gas emissions." [This is from Canada.com, which I use because it is from beyond our politically-polarized counrty.]

Yet the way Gore was treated by Senator Inhofe, the ranking member of the minority, was appalling. Rather than ask questions, Inhofe would make a statement and then refuse to allow Gore to speak. And tonight on the minority page there is this press release:

GORE REFUSES TO TAKE PERSONAL ENERGY ETHICS PLEDGE – Former Vice President Al Gore refused to take a “Personal Energy Ethics Pledge” today to consume no more energy than the average American household.

The pledge was presented to Gore by Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, during today’s global warming hearing. Senator Inhofe showed Gore a film frame from “An Inconvenient Truth” where it asks viewers: “Are you ready to change the way you live?”

Gore has been criticized for excessive home energy usage at his residence in Tennessee. His electricity usage is reportedly 20 times higher than the average American household.

Senator Barbara Boxer, chairman of the committee, intervened to allow former vice president Gore to answer. Gore said his family is using renewable engery and is adding solar panels to their house. He has, in effect, already changed his family's way of living. It was obvious to me that Inhofe was trying to shift the focus from industry's excessive greenhouse gas emissions to Gore personally, attacking HIM instead of the problem. Also from Canada.com was this part of the exchange:

Republican Joe Barton of Texas said the science is still uneven and was critical of Gore's solutions, saying they "fail the common sense test" and "provide little benefit at a huge cost."

"One scientist said it's a stronger consensus than on anything except perhaps gravity," an incredulous Gore responded.

"The planet has a fever. If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says: 'You have to intervene here,' you don't say: 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that told me it's not a problem.'

"If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame retardant. You take action."

I was impressed with Gore's calm and measured responses and his ability to bring the focus back to the real emergency. To read more about what was said today, read both sides of the issue at this link to the Senate committee: http://epw.senate.gov/public/

Monday, March 19, 2007

An Inconvenient Truth

: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It
by Al Gore, copyright 2006
"Almost all of the mountain glaciers in the world are now melting, many of them quite rapidly. There is a message in this" (pp. 48-49).
I could fill this post with nothing but quotes from the book.
"The science textbooks had to be rewritten in 2004. They used to say, 'It's impossible to have hurricanes in the South Atlantic.' But that year, for the first time ever, a hurricane hit Brazil" (pp. 84-85).
Here's more about the polar bears that I mentioned in an earlier post:
"The melting of the [Arctic] ice represents bad news for creatures like polar bears. A new scientific study shows that, for the first time, polar bears have been drowning in significant numbers. Such deaths have been rare in the past. But now, these bears find they have to swim much longer distances from floe to floe. In some places, the edge of the ice is 30 to 40 miles from the shore" (pp. 146-147).
Global warming is disrupting delicately balanced ecological relationships among species, like this example:
"A study from the Netherlands ... shows that 25 years ago, the peak arrival date for the migratory birds was April 25. Their chicks hatched almost six weeks later, peaking on June 3, just in time for the height of the caterpillar season. Now, two decades of warming later, the birds still arrive in late April, but the caterpillars are peaking two weeks earlier, leaving the mother birds without their traditional source of food for the chicks. The peak hatching date has moved slightly forward, but cannot move by much. As a result, the chicks are in trouble" (pp. 152-153).
Trees are also affected by climate change:
"This picture shows a portion of 14 million acres of spruce trees in Alaska and British Columbia that have been killed by bark beetles, whose rapid spread was once slowed by colder and longer winters" (pp. 156-157).
Greenland's ice is also melting. In 2004 Sir David King, U.K. Science Advisor said, "The maps of the world will have to be redrawn."
"If Greenland melted or broke up and slipped into the sea -- or if half of Greenland and half of Antarctica melted or broke up and slipped into the sea, sea levels worldwide would increase by between 18 and 20 feet" (pp. 196-197).
The next page shows us what would happen to Florida. The coastal areas would be covered by the rising ocean and Okefenokee Swamp would be connected to open ocean. Much of the Netherlands would also be covered by the rising water, and they have already launched a competition among architects to design floating homes, some pictured on page 203. The double-page photos are National Geographic quality showing these disasters and more.
"This image shows the largest ice shelf in the Arctic -- the Ward Hunt shelf. Three years ago [in 2002] it cracked in half, to the astonishment of scientists. This had never happened before" (pp.128-129).
If more people would read this book or watch Gore's Oscar Award-winning film "An Inconvenient Truth," maybe there would be a chance to save the world from the dire effects of global warming. Yes, I know that sounds extreme, but we are already in an "emergency" (as the subtitle says) and, at least in this country, refuse to make needed changes if doing so would in any way disrupt profits for major corporations. I don't understand why those who believe in God are unwilling to use their God-given minds to see the disaster rushing toward us.

Friday, March 16, 2007

National Day of Climate Action

April 14th. Mark that day on your calendar. It will be a National Day of Climate Action with tens of thousands of Americans gathering all across the country to call for action on climate change. What we want is for congress to cut carbon emissions 80% by 2050.

The new congress seems to have put climate change and energy as top priorities. Let's speak up and say that we won't settle for anything less than strong climate legislation.

People in all 50 states have planned, at last count, 935 "Step It Up 2007" events for April 14th. My concern is that the nearest one to Chattanooga is in Sewanee. Make that two, as the students at the university there have set up two events.

Visit http://www.stepitup2007.org/ and volunteer to lead an event in Chattanooga, or in YOUR town.
[NOTE added on Wednesday, March 21: This climate action post was published as a letter to the editor in today's Chattanooga Times Free Press. Now let's hope someone steps up to get an event set up here.]

March 19 update: The count is 954.
March 21 update: The count is 1000.
March 26 update: The count is 1048.
March 28 update: The count is 1092.
April 3 update: 1178.
April 6 update: 1294.
April 9 update: 1312. And still no event is scheduled for Chattanooga.
April 10 update: 1333, and maybe we are about to have an event!
April 14 update: 1420. Yes, Chattanooga DID have an event, a virtual event, by sending emails to Congress.

FAQs

Why are we asking for 80% carbon cuts by 2050?
How can we cut carbon 80% by 2050?
Are there any carbon-cutting bills currently being discussed in Congress?

Links for learning more

Environmental Law and Policy Center
Co-op America
Union of Concerned Scientists
Apollo Alliance
Energize America
Sustainable Energy Blueprint

Friday, March 9, 2007

Climate change


Today leaders of the EU (European Union) have challenged the world to join them in fighting global warming. The EU has called for energy-saving lighting to be required in homes, offices and streets by the end of this decade and a binding target for 20% renewable sources of energy in use by 2020.

Here's part of the challenge: The leaders are now committed to a target of reducing EU greenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2020, but they will make that 30% if major nations such as the United States, Russia, China, and India will follow suit.

I don't believe the United States will do much, if anything, as long as the current administration is in office. Somehow we need to educate the American people on this issue. The problem is that our news sources seem more interested in keeping us up-to-date on scandals and the sex lives of the stars rather than REAL NEWS.

What's wrong with this picture? Do we not think it is important to protect the very air we breathe? Do we not understand that if we ruin this earth we don't have anywhere else to go?

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer said, just an hour ago, "The Bush administration is ordering federal wildlife officials headed for international meetings on polar bears not to talk about how climate change and melting ice are affecting the imperiled animals. It is the latest in a string of cases in which the administration has carefully controlled or even banned government employees' public speech about global warming."

Yet the polar bear's habitat is threatened by the melting Arctic sea ice. No, this administration won't take the EU challenge. I hope other countries do.